![]() ![]() The result is still not as good as the original upload (4.2 MB and 2700×3375 resolution), but this is the closest I can get The original url has a file size of 153 KB and 1024x1280 resolution, while the modified URL has a file size of 2.03 MB and 2190x2738 resolution. If upscale is not enabled, the returned image will maintain the original size.Įxample: original URL vs modified URL. In case the required image is larger than the original, upscale should be enabled (lg_1) in order for a proportional upscale to be applied. The reasons to have this dimension are: (1) 5100 pixels is the limit of the system anything above it will result in 400 Bad Request. The definitions of the values can be found in Wix's Image Service, but basically, w_5100,h_5100 requests the width and height of the image to be 5100x5100 pixels, bl requires the baseline JPEG version, and q_100 sets the quality to 100% of the original. In this case, you remove ?token= and its values, add /intermediary in front of /f/ in the URL, and change the image settings right after /v1/fill/ to w_5100,h_5100,bl,q_100. URL with /v1/fill inside: this means that the image went through Wix's encoding system and is modified to a specific size and quality. Below are the three different formats of direct image URLs I found: They linked most of the direct images to a stripped-down version of the original images hence the bad image quality. This is not the case few years ago when the original image was accessible through right click, but on 2017, Wix acquired DeviantArt, and has been migrating the images to their own image hosting system from the original DeviantArt system. Learn to cope, and learn to listen.For direct image URL, the image quality is much lower than the original upload (the resolution and size of the original upload can be found in the right sidebar). You are the scum, we are those who call you pathetic twats out and put evidence to your unholy deeds. Like YOU Mod-S, Bird will soon find out his place is not above the law, it's below it and us. Who has a history of attacking, and abusing kids for 10 or so years, he even admited he gave up and "left" only for him to return and attack his victims' friends because they were not letting it go. What's more, you are known to be protecting a peadophile, aka BirdThatWhispers/AnimeCitizen. I know for a fact Tri dislikes you, and wouldn't dream of helping, never mind working with you to stage this drama for your own amusement. You wanted us to roll over and die because we called you out on solid evidence you and your group members were caught breaking the law! The fact your next claim would be that I threated to doxx people? But is that a bit ironic that you would claim that, just days prior to you doxxing Tri to get her home address, sending her a magazine that was part of a subscription. I as well as others, have undeniable evidence of you and your members, slandering, stalking, harassing, bullying, abusing, and fabricating utter bullshit to post in your "defence", with that being said, I can safely say without a doubt in my mind, you have the IQ of a seven-year-old brat throwing a tantrum because you're not getting what you wanted! Or the fact you would stoop so low, lower than you've already been to use 9/11 as evidence, to claim your actions were not of a terrorist nature. I find it hilarious that you seem to think people will believe anything you throw out there, Mod-S. His threats of doxxing definitely puts him on thin ice since he did break the rules for making death threats. In fact, he's literally just making baseless accusations that do not hold water at all. However, he does not have hard proof of it anywhere since he's throwing that word around thinking it would make him "smarter". I find it hilarious that Lupiss is waving around the "terrorist" claim. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |